Work Environment

On Friday we got a presentation at Computas by Sintef. The topic of the presentation was work environment and workspace. By this meaning office layout and its implication on efficiency, productivity and identity. They had an interesting perspective on how we where behaving in different workspace solutions. One of the points i picked up was the difference between a workspace geared for communication versus concentration. Cell offices works best for the latter and they had seen increase in communication with open office solutions. This created reactions in the audience which today have cell offices, but often with an "open" space between their offices. The offices are also occupied by people working on the same project. It was mentioned that the walls toward the open space was made of glass. Only that most people sit with their back to the door and the glass wall and the open space between the cell offices.

I think moving around is healthy for your own motivation and inspiration. I also think that open office solutions is one of the better solutions for knowledge workers. Here is what I wrote in my master thesis on the subject:

Work Environment
As an important facilitator of knowledge sharing Davenport and Prusak (1998) mention the work environment. They claim that changes in the work environment may cause loss of knowledge and it can also disrupt the existing sharing process. Knowledge has a tendency to thrive only in the environment it develops. Elements mentioned are, “organisational size, focus, management and intangibles as trust and atmosphere.” In the previous section organisational structure and size was described as an influential element to the way a knowledge worker performs. Knowledge workers often collaborate in different ways and use communication tools as well as face-to-face communication.

Office environment needs to facilitate the collaboration and exchange of tacit as well as explicit knowledge, Davenport (2005) mentions meeting spaces and conference rooms as a minimum. He goes further and suggests, based on findings by Thomas Allen (1984), that knowledge workers who need to communicate should be located physically close to each other. Becker and Sims (2001) claim, “The more open the environment, the more frequent the communication and the shorter the duration.” In addition to this they say that the communication in such an environment is “not viewed as interruptions, but these short, frequent interactions provide very fast feedback and shortresponse times, allowing work to move forward overall.” The data from Becker and Sims’ report also suggest that more visual contact actually contributes to fewer unwanted interactions, by “changing not so much the frequency as the timing of serendipitous communication.” By this they mean that by having visual contact the workers can see if the others are busy and not interrupt. On a more organisational level Allen (1984) claims that knowledge workers work environment should have aspects from the departments that work with Human Resources (HR), Information Technology (IT) and facilities organisations. These aspects together can create a thriving working environment with elements important for atmosphere, communication and the use of process supporting tools.

References

Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998) Working knowledge : how organizations manage
what they know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.

Davenport, T. H. (2005) Thinking for a living : how to get better performance and results
from knowledge workers, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.

Allen, J. T. (1984) Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Becker, F. and Sims, W. (2001) Offices That Work - Balancing Communication,
Flexibility and Cost, October, Cornell University.